The machine

Layer 1: Inventory

What exists to be bought later, and what it is worth.

Start here · 24 other posts build on this

Deciding on purpose what comes out of the initial sale. The core stays market complete, everything else attaches to the milestone that earns it, and the same item sells later at full value. Sequencing, not subtraction.

In this layer

  • Beyond what they bought first, could you list everything your customers could buy from you, or through you? Almost nobody has ever taken the inventory. An empty one is a design choice, and it's reversible starting with the next contract.

  • Everyone believes their customers will buy more. Almost nobody builds the mechanism that makes it happen. Belief without machinery has a name, and it collects exactly nothing.

  • Value per item isn't a list price. The same add-on carries three prices across segments, and the same item is worth 10x presented after the milestone that earns it. Mispriced timing is the largest silent discount in your business.

  • Adding more things to the sale for the same price is a discount. You just discounted everything in the bundle. Which reframes overstuffing the initial sale as a pricing decision rather than a packaging one, and answers the honest objection five ways.

  • I've made the case for holding things back and left the other half unsaid. Two reasons an item legitimately belongs in the first deal, one test that decides both, and why including something they can't use yet costs you twice instead of once.

  • Sometimes, slightly. Then the deal closes faster, the buyer stops negotiating over things they can't use, the account reaches the same value through earned offers, and renewal contraction never arrives. ASP measures one moment in a relationship that has many.

  • Most expansion motions aren't motions. They're reactions. Here's the six-step system that makes expansion something you run, not something that happens to you.

  • Most companies do land and stay, not land and expand. The initial contract was signed by a customer who didn't fully trust you yet. Six months in, that's a different customer.

  • Your best customers are actively trying to give you more money. They got what they paid for, which is rare, and they want more, and no aisle exists for them to walk down. Expansion is answering demand, not extracting it.

  • There's a reflex that the follow-on ask should be modest. Ease them in, don't push. But the follow-on gets priced at what it's worth at the moment it's earned, and that number is frequently larger than the first deal.

  • A bundle takes two things and returns one number, so the price tells you nothing about which part they were paying for. You find out when you remove one, and by then the information arrives as cancellations.

  • Expansion is not a pricing ladder. It's a surface. You can move up, sideways, deeper, or inward. Most companies only know about up.

  • Look at expansion one product at a time and the opportunity disappears. Nobody builds machinery for a line that small. But the products are separate and the customers aren't, so the cost of the machinery is shared while the return is summed. Product-level accounting can't see that, which is why multi-product companies systematically under-expand.

Back to the framework