The machine

What Stops This

Why it does not get built, and what stops it.

Start here · 2 other posts build on this

Count the ways revenue enters the business. If the answer's one, and it's new business sales, you've got a VP of Sales with a better title.

In this layer

  • When a sales motion misses the number you diagnose it. Coverage, ramp, discovery, comp. When the expansion number misses, the category gets retired. Same evidence, opposite verdict, and the reason isn't laziness.

  • Ask a sales trainer to build your expansion motion and they'll say yes, and mean it. They will help you sell anything to anybody, which is a real skill and the exact disqualification. Then the part nobody connects: the advice they gave on the call is what capped the account.

  • It gets said with confidence, and usually with evidence, because they did try it. What they tested was one specific approach, it failed for reasons that had nothing to do with expansion, and the conclusion drawn from that failure now justifies everything that follows.

  • A customer who joined two months before your base period ended contributes two months to the baseline and twelve to the comparison. The difference books as expansion. It isn't expansion, it's arithmetic, and the faster you're growing the more of it you have.

  • A test for your operating decisions: is this correct, or is it only correct if expansion is something that happens to you rather than something you cause.

  • Lay out readiness gates, triggers, orchestration and unbundling and people hear a list of constraints. A reader named the real objection: a gate takes away your ability to force the number. Correct. Forcing the number is the thing making you poor.

  • Put someone's whole compensation on the size of their book and wait. It is an exit executed slowly enough that management never has to own it.

  • Four separate failures, in four different parts of a business, all built the same way. Every step in each one was a reasonable decision, and the last step in each one removed the thing that would have shown anybody it was wrong.

  • You will not win the argument that a price increase isn't expansion, and you don't need to. Split last year's number into two columns, follow both groups forward, and let the churn and contraction rates settle it. The prediction is falsifiable, which is the point.

Back to the framework